109
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago

Ackshually, there is no nudity in this photo, it is only an artist's depiction of something that is clearly fictive.

No birds were exploited in the making of this. How could it be immoral?

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago

But what if the ballsy bird can consent?

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

look, I didn't follow the struggle session close enough to make a good follow-up joke about it, okay?

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
109 points (96.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13460 readers
761 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS