325
submitted 7 months ago by tree@lemmy.zip to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Body-worn camera footage of the January 25 incident in Gresham was released by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability today.


A Chicago Police officer responding to a ShotSpotter alert fired shots at a child who was playing with fireworks—that’s the conclusion from the Civilian Office of Police Accountability in a statement released today.

“COPA can confirm that a firearm was not used against the officers,” said COPA First Deputy Chief Administrator, Ephraim Eaddy.

CPD initially identified the child as a man, claiming he had opened fire first.

They also reported seeing “flashes of light.”

“When officers arrived in the area, they observed an individual, who has now been identified as a juvenile, standing near a residence. As one officer exited the vehicle, they heard a loud bang, which was later determined to be fireworks. The officer who exited the vehicle discharged their firearm in the direction of the juvenile, who was not struck by gunfire,” investigators state in the press release about the incident.

Body-worn camera footage from the three officers responding to the ShotSpotter alert appears to show one officer immediately fire his gun after hearing a loud bang.

He then yells, “Shots fired! Shots fired!” as another officer radios in a “10-1,” indicating officers are in need of urgent assistance.

read more: https://jinxpress.org/no-its-just-fireworks-chicago-cop-opens-fire-on-child-with-fireworks-after-shotspotter-gunshot-alert/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 251 points 7 months ago

Why are cops allowed to discharge firearms without at least a target? Dude fired 3 rounds wildly after the firework sound. Then they went around shouting "hands up" at some bushes.

These people are a fucking menace.

[-] tree@lemmy.zip 113 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Doesn't help that being a cop unironically requires less training then the vast majority of other jobs. You would think giving someone a gun to point at people, who they're largely supposed to "protect" would require at least a few years of training.

[-] rifugee@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago

Notably, a cosmetologist requires 2-3 times more training than police officers in the US. The only two countries with lower training requirements are Iraq and Afghanistan. Stories like this post, the acorn incident, and shooting into that ladies house, start to make a lot more sense with that context, eh?

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

I have a take on the cosmetologist thing! Sounds silly for a hair cutting job, doesn't it?

Dated a woman who trained cosmetologists at the local college. Gods she was educated.

Thinking out loud one night I said, "Ugh. What's it called when a chemical reaction... uh... opposite of exothermic?"

"Endothermic."

"How the hell you know that?!"

Turns out when you fuck with people's bodies, you have to know some shit. Forgot the topic, but I had asked her how she knew another odd thing.

"Because old people may have nails (whatever, I forgot), and you have to recognize that as a sign of (whatever, I forgot). You cannot use $chemical on them."

Anyway, off topic, but there are reasons cosmetologists are trained and certified. They're certainly more educated than most cops.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
325 points (98.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7146 readers
127 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS