773
submitted 9 months ago by skhayfa@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Question to anyone who might know more: would sodium based batteries be better than lithium ones for the environment, in terms of recycling or disposing of it?

In case they are indeed better, would they be better because it's better to use less lithium in general (so if you use more sodium based ones, you use less lithium) or would they be also better because their own disposal is "nicer" (as in less toxic) for the environment?

[-] Dyf_Tfh@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 9 months ago

I don't find the source anymore, but i saw a lifetime analysis about sodium ion batteries. Overall they are slighly worse than lithium ion due to higher energy input required during fabrication, despite better mineral availability.

The most common Na-ion batteries use Prussian Blue.

[-] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I suppose maybe they're still useful innovations if they can be made with minerals which are more available.

Probably, we could achieve a balance between one type and the other, but I'm daydreaming now...

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
773 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58302 readers
3156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS