this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
56 points (96.7% liked)
technology
24387 readers
327 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
100% of the participants (5) produced liquid sourced from the bladder when squirting. There really isn't anything inconclusive there.
If you go into systemic reviews like so https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23634659/ squirt is also shown to be urine in the examined literature.
Again, there are fluids involved in the vaginal/vulval sexual experience that are not in any way urine. Including the skene's gland producing what we call ejaculate, but "Squirting" is urine. If you are referring to anything but squirting you are correct.
This proves it contains urine, not that it is urine. I know I'm being pedantic here and that the distinction will not matter to some people, but it's there nevertheless and specifically is not ruled out by the source you've given.