this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
56 points (96.7% liked)
technology
24387 readers
327 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have no idea what "Infrared" is but contextually and based on your comment I imagine some sort of antizionist youtuber. Not so with Dieudonné; he is antisemitic, it's not even a debate.
He did shows with Faurisson, an actual holocaust denier that pretends that gas chambers didn't exist. He had, in one of his shows, the same Faurisson receiving an "insolence award" given out by Dieudonné's assistant dressed as a death camp inmate. And that's only the top of the rotten iceberg.
Infrared probably refers to Haz al Din, an obscure reactionary pseudo-marxist clown (unlike with Dieudonné, the comedy seems to be unintentional in his case). Imagine somebody randomly sprinkling "material conditions" over an excerpt from Project 2025, wordfiltering "gender ideology" for "Malthusianism" while retaining the transphobia and so on. He is mostly known for his, admittedly funny, shocked reaction when people on stream convinced him that girlcum is pee (author's note: it is not actually pee) and for making an account on hexbear and telling people that smoking weed has a feminizing effect.
I would normally resent that i know this, but in his case streamer drama is actually mildly entertaining in an absurdist way.
In the case of "squirting" it leaves the body through the urethra and is composed almost entirely of urine sourced from the bladder.
While there may be involvement from skene's gland, calling it pee is absolutely factually true.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36000809/
There are a lot of other fluids involved in vaginal/vulval sexual stimulation, and those are not pee. If you are referring to those, then you're right.
yeah there's not enough volume of those other fluids for a whole big squirt
Just clicking through the related articles, many scientific sources describe squirting as pee and female ejaculation as not pee.
Regardless of this, i weirdly appreciate that this thread spends more time discussing this than discussing Haz.
It's weird that this thread is discussing cum or haz. Wasn't it about the fringes of french politics?
Tiny sample size, inconclusive results, seems to only involve cis women as well.
100% of the participants (5) produced liquid sourced from the bladder when squirting. There really isn't anything inconclusive there.
If you go into systemic reviews like so https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23634659/ squirt is also shown to be urine in the examined literature.
Again, there are fluids involved in the vaginal/vulval sexual experience that are not in any way urine. Including the skene's gland producing what we call ejaculate, but "Squirting" is urine. If you are referring to anything but squirting you are correct.
This proves it contains urine, not that it is urine. I know I'm being pedantic here and that the distinction will not matter to some people, but it's there nevertheless and specifically is not ruled out by the source you've given.
it's mostly pee. it's ok to be into watersports but lying about it being pee is silly