this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
453 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

85242 readers
4027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

'people's work' ...they claimed while plaigerizing

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No. Copypasting pieces of existing code has been standard practice for human programmers since the beginning of programming. Deciding to call it "plagiarism" because it's been automated is just ignorant.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When you copy/paste a piece of code and somebody asks you "Hey this code is pretty awesome how did you write it?", you usually say "No I didn't write it, I just grabbed it from a site."

Vibe coders on the other hand will actively tell you that they wrote it themselves when they actually used an AI. THAT is the difference.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ai is just middle manager of plaigerism. it learned to code from other people. the vibe coder is just claiming ownership over stolen goods.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I learned to code from other people too. Everybody learns to do everything from other people. Making that an argument against AI is just silly. That's my main problem with AI hate - it demonizes practices that are perfectly acceptable when we do them without using AI. A lot of it is also misdirected - for example, AI doesn't fire people, clueless managers fire people because they stupidly think AI is their ticket to career advancement. It's like blaming a saw for cutting in the wrong place. AI hate is really the hollowest, emptiest crusade I've ever seen. The only valid arguments I know of are about the excessive resources it uses - which is true of a lot of other things (golf courses in the desert for example). But to me the ethical passion just feels manufactured by people who desperately need one more thing to hate.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

you either have a deep misunderstanding or complete disregard of 'learning' vs plaigerism.

after seeing all your other deformed posts to me, ive comfirmed the latter. i have no interest in your bad faith posting. go huff farts.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

The one vibe coder I know actively talks about specific things he has it do and how much time it saves him.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

literally the definition of it

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Only to an outsider. Starting with an example and modifying it is a very standard, time-honored programming practice that has never been demonized that I know of. In fact it's the norm for many contractors, who get paid for fast turnover and hugely benefit from taking an existing web page, module, etc. that's similar to their goal and changing it, rather than starting from scratch. The idea isn't to take credit, it's to get the work done.