this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
176 points (99.4% liked)

politics

29858 readers
2248 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you have a source for that? It's absolutely believable but I haven't seen or heard it mentioned before and think that would be a big revelation if it had come out in court or the files.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, although it's a pain to get to - it's part of a two-video interview series (it's a phone interview too which makes it worse) with Maria Farmer, one of the known Epstein victims. The transcript is the best way to get through it but because its auto-transcribed it's pretty terrible to read, still this part is absolutely clear. I'll see if I can find it, I posted it in the c/epsteinfiles comm earlier.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah here we go:

43:35

Gillan had offices then because when I was with them by 1995 they were full

43:41

time she was full time what she called the lady of the house and she was full time getting children for him full time

43:49

I mean full time and the other person who was always going around with her this is really weird Donald Trump's

43:55

ex-wife Ivana was always in the car with her I mean one stantly no one not one news

44:01

organization will mention that I wanted on a truck to explain herself a big old

44:06

cow explain yourself why were you going out acquiring children with this woman that they'd come back and there'd be a pile of kids

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you. I went looking and was surprised (not shocked) to find as much as I did considering I'd not heard anything previously.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER




ok, sorry for that