this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
376 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

9988 readers
818 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone argue that Star Trek is a hard sci-fi.

It deals with technology and its repercussions, is using the future and technological advancement to examine human behaviour.

There's not so many laser sword battles.

[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

That's just sci-fi. Star Wars is a fantasy set in space

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's a decent definition of SF, but "hard" SF means that the technology, science, and logic are accurate based on our understanding of those things. Star Trek doesn't really worry about those things, which is fine, but it's not hard SF.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hard sci-fi: The Expanse, Project Hail Mary; no FTL travel, and physics works mostly as we understand it.

Science Fantasy: Star Wars; space wizards.

Star Trek is neither of these.