this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
268 points (96.2% liked)

PC Gaming

12859 readers
1266 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkeBizNES@lemmy.cafe 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If building a PC does in fact get too expensive for individuals, I wonder what that will do for the sale of the Steam Machine which should (theoretically) get people into PC gaming for much cheaper. Maybe all-in-one pre-built PC's like the steam machine become the norm...idk

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wouldn't mind if this led to devs stopping the constant push for heavier graphics in games and instead moved to making sure they run well with how upgrading is looking to be less and less feasible for more people.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

I think economics would basically push things that way. If most people cannot or will not buy the latest hardware, the investment of 600 million dollars or more into a AAAA game that hardly anyone can run won't happen.

[–] MonkeBizNES@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago

I also think this would be positive honestly

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why is the steam machine not going to be subject to the same costs? Why then would we believe that valve will just eat that?

[–] MonkeBizNES@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Your intuition is correct that the steam machine will go up in price but I think It'll still have an edge over building your own PC for a couple of reasons:

  1. Valve has economies of scale and can make contracts directly with Dram manufacturers/distributers

  2. The Steam Machine is just already cheaper to make than a pre-built because it has a custom APU (rather than a standalone graphics card). Not to mention running Linux means not having to pay for a windows licence

  3. The Steam Machine only has 16 GB of RAM. Most everyone I know building gaming PCs with DDR5 are using 32 GB

The steam machine is not a cutting edge device, but its lower end capabilities may become normalised if building a new PC becomes cost prohibitive. It may force the whole gaming industry to take a step back for a few years. And I mean, the steam Machine can play Cyberpunk 2077 at 4k 60 fps with FSR upscaling so its got enough performance for lots of consumers

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The assumption is that Valve made their procurement deals before the sudden price hikes, in which case the costs might actually be sane until the deal runs out and they need to renegotiate prices.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Same as consoles. Sell at a loss to increase game sales and earn more on the backend.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Consoles are completely locked down so there is only one store you can buy from. Consoles are a safer bet that lost hardware sales would lead to making it up on games.

But, Steam Machine is a PC. Not only can you install games from outside the Steam store. You are able to completely replace the OS. You can have a completely Steamless experience on it.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

Its not happening. Selling a PC just isn't the same as selling a console that can basically "just" play games.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago

Steam already rakes in cash due to being in a dominant market position on pc. Selling at a loss doesn't get them much.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder what that will do for the sale of the Steam Machine which should (theoretically) get people into PC gaming for much cheaper.

Valve said they won't subsidise the cost of the Steam Machine, it will be roughly the same price as a regular PC.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

I think that quote says it would be cost competitive with equivalent PC parts, which is cheaper than buying a prebuilt computer, fwiw. (And you'll get a compact GabeCube instead of a big tower).

I expect GabeCubes might be my kiddos first desktops. CachyOS should run like a dream on 'em, so they'll work great as both computers and entry-level gaming rigs.

[–] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 20 points 1 day ago

It's an interesting scenario.

I'd posit that the possibility mostly depends on the aquisition of RAM by Valve before the memory market implosion.

If Valve is able to successfully sell Steam Machines then other SIs and manufacturers might revisit the gaming market.


Based on Micron's action of exiting the consumer market (by killing off their Crucial division) I'd imagine that most manufaturers are considering doing the same as the demand from AI hyperscalers has become obnoxiously enticing for most corporate entities.