this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
192 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14187 readers
561 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 50 points 2 days ago (5 children)

All the adventurism haters pretty vindicated this year as all of the adventurism that happened amounted to literally nothing.

Get organized folks, random acts of individual violence are meaningless

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 64 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think it amounted to nothing. I think the before and after of this event has completely and totally changed conversations I have. Previously if I so much as veered towards the very idea of harming property, let alone doing violence, I would have been met with intense pushback from "civility" liberals. Now though? It has become fringe to be against violence if ghouls clearly deserve it.

Has it achieved policy change? No. But has it affected the proletariat? 100% yes it has, it broke the obsession with non-violence and high-ground in the massive majority of people. I see that as a prerequisite to revolution. You can not perform violence without people supporting violence and catalyst events need to occur that push people onto that.

Similarly however, catalyst events can push people in the opposite direction too.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every revolution has an adventurist phase. Going "uh aktually adventurism is bad" isn't going to stop that phase from happening. The phases are nonviolence -> disorganized violence -> organized violence. The organizational phases of organized violence is paramilitary -> guerilla army -> conventional military -> nuclear power.

The key question is which you think is better at turning into organized violence: organized nonviolence or disorganized violence?

[–] jack@hexbear.net 28 points 2 days ago

The key question is which you think is better at turning into organized violence: organized nonviolence or disorganized violence?

Eventually they synthesize when they each reach sufficient scale. Disorganized violence is inevitable, but solid organization must be consciously built.

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

counterpoint: random acts of individual violence, while meaningless, can be extremely funny

[–] anoriginalthought@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

Even if it means and amounts to nothing, it brought a lot of people a little bit of joy and gave us all a sense of community, of shared sentiment. For one brief second, we were united while the ruling class trembled. It won't topple the bourgeoisie, but the working class shared something, and I think that's kind of special.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It amounted to brian Thompson being dead

[–] mendiCAN@hexbear.net 27 points 2 days ago

and while not nearly enough to satisfy it was a meal i would have again

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

mmm... keep going...

[–] dustcommie@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All the "Get Organized" haters are vindicated because they have amounted to nothing or even set backs... Not every action brings about revolution or topples empires or changes policy in a bourgeois state etc.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ridiculous take, because every win that has ever happened in history has happened because of folks who got organized. I mean plenty of unions had wins this year and every year, you think that's just a coincidence?

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

you think that's just a coincidence

yes trump-yassified