this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
132 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

10728 readers
242 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (11 children)

What bothers me about this perspective is the implicit assumption that everyone who thinks that public displays of religion should be banned is actually motivated by racism, rather than recognising that somebody can be against this for non-racist reasons.

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Sure, you can be against it for authoritarian reasons as well. Disturbing.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't really see how that's related. Even if it were motivated by racism, that'd be equally authoritarian to any other motive, since authoritarianism is about ceding rights from individuals to the government and it doesn't matter what the motivation for that is.

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Fair enough: regardless of whether racism is involved or not, there is an authoritarian bent to this law. In my opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)