this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
107 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8532 readers
97 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Graeber talks about it in Debt and it makes Cortes look like an even bigger loser. He and all the conquistadors were terrible with money and in debt to European banks. They were trying to strip the place of everything they could to stay afloat.
And then after the Black Death the aristocracy clamped down on the workers by only accepting silver as payment, the main resource coming from the Americas at the time, which was already accounted for by the people importing it and most of which was going over to pay off the Ottoman Empire anyway. So it was a double whammy of oppression
I feel like conquistadores should be understood within the social forces that incentivized conquest but I also want to hate Cortes. We can do a little bit of both me thinks.
I'm just gonna hate all of them. No one had to go over there and do that
That's so valid!