this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
80 points (96.5% liked)

science

22667 readers
190 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

High levels of CO2 are 100% toxic, why would you ever suggest otherwise?

[–] Semester3383@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically accurate, but not accurate in any meaningful way in this context.

The planet would be unlivable LONG before CO2 levels got high enough to directly risk the health and safety of humans through inhalation.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

You know, I mistakenly conflate CO2 and particulate matter — I recognize my error.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We aren’t even halfway to the “this isn’t a great idea to live in” levels, and far from lethal levels. Purely from a “toxicity” level your bedroom at night is far worse than projected co2 levels in the next 100 years.

Does that mean it’s fine to keep increasing? No. But arguing that we are anywhere near “high levels” as it pertains to toxicity is inherently flawed.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

You know, I mistakenly conflate CO2 and particulate matter — I recognize my error.