this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
98 points (88.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

13833 readers
552 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (25 children)

Of course. You can't just paint a bike lane and expect people to ditch the car. The car has huge advantages: you can drive it in any weather, you don't need to follow a bus schedule, you can carry your whole family safely. You only convince people to replace the car with public transport or bike if those options become overwhelmingly convenient and safe. If the bus only comes twice an hour, only people who can't afford a car will use it.

As long as the car is the most convenient way to access cities, habits will not change. We need more streets restricted to bus and bike only, and more parking converted to bike lanes.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Tbh, there needs to be a more structured plan in shifting public infrastructure/zoning in a whmay that reshapes a city into the desired form of cycleable/walkable/public transportable city.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely. I've live in a city before where they deployed bike lanes as if all the counter was the number of kilometers. No plan whatsoever.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In environmental conservation, there's an old saw about how we're really good at preserving rocks and ice, i.e. places we can't make productive use of anyway. I've noticed exactly the same effect in urban planning: We're pretty good about prioritizing bike and pedestrian access where it doesn't affect drivers, i.e. places hardly anybody wants to go.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)