Linux Questions

2837 readers

38 users here now

Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)

stay on topic
be nice (no name calling)
do not post long blocks of text such as logs
do not delete your posts
only post questions (no information posts)

Tips for giving and receiving help

be as clear and specific
say thank you if a solution works
verify your solutions before posting them as facts.

Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip

How do you feel about Flatpak? Do you like having universal packages separated from the operating system, or do you regret how much space they take? (piefed.zip)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/linuxquestions@lemmy.zip

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was reading a bit about it recently, seems like there two positions are valid, curious to see what people here think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I've used them before, and they work aside from a lack of integration with other programs. Same as any other isolation system (like Snap).

My main problem is a lack of digital signatures on the packages. Deb, RPM, everything else is digitally signed, and has been for a long time. Flatpaks should be signed too.