this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
48 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37738 readers
414 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are drugs made this way unpatentable, like AI generated images or text aren't copyrightable?

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i don't think so, if the model is owned by single company, trained on their own dataset, access is restricted and basically used as an internal tool, that would make that company sole owners of all generated content right? that's what happened with chematica, this is used for synthesis planning at merck so mildly similar area

Well that's not how it works with AI generated text or images. OpenAI can't copyright anything ChatGPT produces no more than anyone else can.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

The article gives a hint, by explaining AI does only part of the work.

AI systems cannot yet accomplish every part of the drug development process alone, particularly in the late stages.