347
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

If the government needs to step in, they need to make sure they get ownership. Take it off the market. Shares should just become worthless.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Western governments don't want ownership. Politicians see ownership of capital assets as political liabilities. They require real labor and talent management and long term maintenance and planning. Western governments want kickbacks from successful privately run enterprises (or, at least, profitably run businesses) in the forms of employee income taxes, which can be turned into sinecures and patronages for their underlyings.

Nationalization is antithetical to how a modern western politician succeeds in their positions.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

In Europe we have seen banks nationalized, politically appointed people put in charge. The banks managed back on track and now slowly sold back into the market again to make up for the loss. The shareholders got nothing when the banks where nationalized.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago
[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

And that's how you permanently destabilize a market economy!

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

What’s it called when private equity steps in, buys it and then starts selling off chunks of it?

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
347 points (99.7% liked)

Work Reform

10132 readers
281 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS